clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Pier 17 Retail Shops Fear the Worst: Skyrocketing Rents

New, 1 comment
A Pier 17 rendering, and a pile of money via <a href=";search_source=search_form&amp;version=llv1&amp;anyorall=all&amp;safesearch=1&amp;searchterm=stacks+on+money&amp;search_group=#id=115685188&amp;sr
A Pier 17 rendering, and a pile of money via

Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.

Things were looking hopeful for the tenants at the Pier 17 mall at the South Street Seaport. After some back-and-forth, it seemed like they might have been able to capitalize on the summer season, rather than closing down in April so that the Howard Hughes Corp. could prep for a massive renovation. However, things didn't go so well at Thursday's City Council meeting.

Crain's reports that in addition to vacating in April, a lot of the tenants fear they won't be welcome to return: "None of the tenants, who have been asked to vacate Pier 17 by April 30, has been encouraged to come back to the new building, said [City Councilwoman Margaret] Chin, adding that rumors are swirling about the exorbitant rents Howard Hughes will charge in the future."

And then the conversation got ugly. Chin continued: "A dog grooming business in the neighborhood was told by Howard Hughes 'you can't afford what I'm going to charge.' We've heard as much as $300 a square foot. Is that true?" Christopher Curry, the senior vp of development, responded, "If I got $300 a square foot, I'd be very happy. We want to charge as much rent as we can."
· South Street Seaport developer grilled at hearing [Crain's]
· Pier 17 Shops May Be Able to Capitalize on the Summer After All [Racked NY]
· The Seaport's Pier 17 Mall Is Still Unable to Reopen After Sandy [Racked NY]

89 South Street New York, NY